apublicdefender.com

TMYK: Due Process edition

Posted on July 01, 2008 by Gideon

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

Apparently, it is not a violation of due process in the state of CT if there is not an adequate factual basis for a plea stated on the record. See Paulsen v. Manson, 203 Conn. 484 (1987). Who’da thunk it?

Sphere: Related Content

Category criminal law principles, ct state law, fifth amendment

RSS feed | Trackback URI

Comments »

No comments yet.

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post

← Castle doctrine come home to roost
Heller goes to the airport →

  • pd blog search

    How is this search different?

  • syndication

    AddThis Social Bookmark Button
    AddThis Feed Button

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Terms of use

    Nothing on this blog is legal advice.
    Read the Legal Disclaimer and Privacy Policy.
    For the full comments policy, click here.

  • stats



    Creative Commons License
    This workis licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.


    Add to Technorati Favorites





    Powered by WordPress - WordPress Blogs Directory
    < A Legally Inclined Weblog >


↑ Top